Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

From Eva Weinmayr Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
<references />
 
<references />
 +
 +
 +
==early roadmap==
 +
 +
I) Introduction
 +
 +
What is the enquiry about?
 +
 +
What are the possibilities within these operations to realise or to do Feminist / Emancipatory / Critical -Political “praxis” (i.e.,  a working-thinking-doing-speaking) both within institutional frameworks and outside/between institutions i.e., not simply a solo run)?
 +
To answer this question entails taking actions (e.g., setting up a reading room situation; doing publications etc.) and reflecting upon these actions in differing forums or with different constituencies and then testing these action-reflection-s against a criterion of “feminist /emancipatory/political”
 +
field of expanded publishing
 +
what are the blockages
 +
what are the possibilities? to anwer taking action, responding, acting, contextual,
 +
 +
 +
 +
Context of the enquiry
 +
 +
What are the operations that are specifically addressed?  What are the blockages to realizing a Feminist / Emancipatory / Critical -Political “praxis” within the existing operational models – authoring, publishing, disseminating, cataloguing, taxonomies, librarianship models, course reading lists, pedagogical uses of published works and publishing … these moments not necessarily separate … diagnosis of the problem
 +
What do we mean by a Feminist / Emancipatory / Critical -Political “praxis” OR what would the effect of this look like? If a praxis is emancipatory what would show that it is so?
 +
enclosure / injustice –
 +
metadata restrictions…
 +
 +
 +
 +
identifies what is in the list of submitted materials
 +
is the contetualising..... the material includes: a list, describes what is in the box.
 +
chapters, papers, ephemera, (documenation of worksshop/representations)
 +
 +
____________
 +
 +
 +
First step:
 +
 +
II)  The state of the art in this domain (expanded description of field of operation), "literature review"
 +
 +
What has already been proposed by others in this space?
 +
A set of examples authorship, publishing, librarianship, cataloguing, pedagogical
 +
Other practices, that make a claim to be critical, feminist etc....., historical taxonomy,  certain way of thinking, theoritical,
 +
 +
 +
An observation we can make here: Artists moved into publishing to exit or bypass certain perceived limitations of the dominant art system institutional frame but historically these practices have been (re-captured or re-anchored or re-integrated or co-opted or re-located ) into the current dominant art system institutional frames: an attempt at emancipatory action is seen to fail in some important sense) 
 +
Another observation: Open access …
 +
 +
dominant paradigm: standard model, describe: divison of labour, authorship, design, distribtion,
 +
 +
how this has been contested/challenged by artists, activists,
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
III) What are the experiments that have been done? (expand on list above)
 +
 +
How have these practices been simultaneously theorized/reflected?
 +
Description of how each “experiment” (work/publication/presentation/event) proceeds from the previous “experiment”…
 +
 +
 +
summary , listing, pointing to the writings, previously published chapters, extended version of an abstract
 +
dont get lost in detail, keep overview, first pass of description
 +
 +
Analysis
 +
 +
What possibilities have been accessed or opened up or demonstrated?
 +
Based on these experiments can we outline a transferable model or set of principles or operational guide … that could be implemented by a variety of institutional actors?
 +
 +
 +
 +
art practice?
 +
cultural practice   
 +
knowledge work
 +
 +
 +
List of “operations”
 +
“Alternative” publishing and dissemination strategies
 +
“Alternative” reading practices
 +
“Alternative” writing practices – “collectively authored”
 +
“Alternative” library models
 +
pedagogical models
 +
knowledge work
 +
institutional frameworks or models of practice in publishing / dissemination / reading /cataloguing / providing access / using “publications” within pedagogical processes…
 +
 +
 +
 +
IV) Where is the enquiry located?
 +
Contemporary art field in a wide sense
 +
Within the context of educational turn
 +
Triangulating across A. Publishing B. Education C. Institutional cultures
 +
Variously intent upon realizing a Political practice Feminist practice Emancipatory practices
 +
“Alternative” is a place holder for something about locating the practices with a political agenda or project that draws upon ideas of doing Feminist / Emancipatory / Critical -Political work/actions
 +
 +
 +
How will the project submission be structured ?
 +
A “capa” and set of published texts; set of exhibited works; set of pedagogical interventions; set of other actions
 +
 +
 +
 +
The capa
 +
-identifies what is in the list of submitted materials
 +
-establishes the general context of the contribution
 +
-describes the way the contribution(s) have been realized / made
 +
-asserts the significance of the contribution to its wider field(s)
 +
-indicates future direction for further research
 +
 +
  
  

Revision as of 19:10, 6 October 2018

MediaWiki has been installed.

about this wiki

This wiki is a site to develop and share my PhD while writing it. It is a way to map a tentative process of writing, thinking and discovering, discarding and restructuring – all the messy decision making processes which differentiates "a practice" from a finished output. This wiki is also a method for me to depart from the solitary word document on my hard disk and make the moments of "taking shape" public and transparent. Finding ways to share my research and practice has been an ongoing – and at times difficult – negotiation between a set of forces pulling in different directions: academia, feminist and activist practice, the arts, and education. Using a wiki for my research dissemination allows me to make transparent what is usually developed and discussed behind closed doors. In a few months time, or when this draft has enough substance, I will invite peers to be in dialogue, to comment, to debate. My doctoral research is (and has been) supervised by Jyoti Mistry and Mick Wilson, Dave Beech and Andrea Phillips. It is conducted as a PhD in artistic practice at Valand Academy, University of Gothenburg.

Please be aware that what you are reading now is a draft. When you're going to cite it, please do reference this fact. If you have questions or comments [1] get in touch: eva.weinmayr (at) akademinvaland.gu.se

  1. ↑ please


early roadmap

I) Introduction

What is the enquiry about?

What are the possibilities within these operations to realise or to do Feminist / Emancipatory / Critical -Political “praxis” (i.e., a working-thinking-doing-speaking) both within institutional frameworks and outside/between institutions i.e., not simply a solo run)? To answer this question entails taking actions (e.g., setting up a reading room situation; doing publications etc.) and reflecting upon these actions in differing forums or with different constituencies and then testing these action-reflection-s against a criterion of “feminist /emancipatory/political” 

field of expanded publishing
what are the blockages

what are the possibilities? to anwer taking action, responding, acting, contextual,


Context of the enquiry

What are the operations that are specifically addressed? What are the blockages to realizing a Feminist / Emancipatory / Critical -Political “praxis” within the existing operational models – authoring, publishing, disseminating, cataloguing, taxonomies, librarianship models, course reading lists, pedagogical uses of published works and publishing … these moments not necessarily separate … diagnosis of the problem What do we mean by a Feminist / Emancipatory / Critical -Political “praxis” OR what would the effect of this look like? If a praxis is emancipatory what would show that it is so? enclosure / injustice – metadata restrictions…


identifies what is in the list of submitted materials is the contetualising..... the material includes: a list, describes what is in the box. chapters, papers, ephemera, (documenation of worksshop/representations)

____________


First step:

II) The state of the art in this domain (expanded description of field of operation), "literature review"

What has already been proposed by others in this space? A set of examples authorship, publishing, librarianship, cataloguing, pedagogical Other practices, that make a claim to be critical, feminist etc....., historical taxonomy, certain way of thinking, theoritical,


An observation we can make here: Artists moved into publishing to exit or bypass certain perceived limitations of the dominant art system institutional frame but historically these practices have been (re-captured or re-anchored or re-integrated or co-opted or re-located ) into the current dominant art system institutional frames: an attempt at emancipatory action is seen to fail in some important sense) Another observation: Open access … 

dominant paradigm: standard model, describe: divison of labour, authorship, design, distribtion,

how this has been contested/challenged by artists, activists,

III) What are the experiments that have been done? (expand on list above)

How have these practices been simultaneously theorized/reflected? Description of how each “experiment” (work/publication/presentation/event) proceeds from the previous “experiment”…


summary , listing, pointing to the writings, previously published chapters, extended version of an abstract dont get lost in detail, keep overview, first pass of description

Analysis

What possibilities have been accessed or opened up or demonstrated? Based on these experiments can we outline a transferable model or set of principles or operational guide … that could be implemented by a variety of institutional actors?


art practice? cultural practice knowledge work 


List of “operations”

“Alternative” publishing and dissemination strategies “Alternative” reading practices “Alternative” writing practices – “collectively authored” “Alternative” library models pedagogical models knowledge work institutional frameworks or models of practice in publishing / dissemination / reading /cataloguing / providing access / using “publications” within pedagogical processes…


IV) Where is the enquiry located? Contemporary art field in a wide sense Within the context of educational turn Triangulating across A. Publishing B. Education C. Institutional cultures Variously intent upon realizing a Political practice Feminist practice Emancipatory practices “Alternative” is a place holder for something about locating the practices with a political agenda or project that draws upon ideas of doing Feminist / Emancipatory / Critical -Political work/actions


How will the project submission be structured ? A “capa” and set of published texts; set of exhibited works; set of pedagogical interventions; set of other actions


The capa -identifies what is in the list of submitted materials -establishes the general context of the contribution -describes the way the contribution(s) have been realized / made -asserts the significance of the contribution to its wider field(s) -indicates future direction for further research



context



New proposal: New structure


to do

send authorship text to Nourbese Phillips.


method

bibliography references

Alperin, J.P., Muñoz Nieves, C., Schimanski, L., Fischman, G.E., Niles, M.T. & McKiernan, E.C. (2018). How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion, and tenure documents? Humanities Commons [preprint]. doi: Media:http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/M6W950N35

Genette, Gérard, Paratexts, Thresholds of interpretation (Cambridge University Press, 1997)

Hall, Gary, “Digitize this Book, The Politics of New Media, or Why We Need Open Access Now”, Minnesota University Press, 2008

Hayles, Katherine N. , "How We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis" (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012)

Leigh Star, Susan

Olson, Hope A., “How we construct Subjects: Feminist Analysis”, in Library Trends, Johns Hopkins University Press, Volume 56, Number 2, Fall 2007, pp. 509-541


van Mourik Broekman, P. , Hall, G. , Byfield, T. , Hides, S. and Worthington, S. "Open education: A study in disruption" (London: Rowman & Littlefield International, 2014) Media:https://curve.coventry.ac.uk/open/file/c04530ce-d16a-46ca-b359-a905195a76cb/1/Open education.pdf














Getting started

Consult the User's Guide for information on using the wiki software.

This is the start This was a coment Comments are visible only in the edit zone. and them....

File:Cataloguing-glasgow-library 2.jpg

Retrieved from "http://wiki.evaweinmayr.com/index.php?title=Main_Page&oldid=94"
Facts about "Main Page"
RDF feed