Main Page

From Eva Weinmayr Wiki
Revision as of 08:13, 6 October 2020 by Eva (talk | contribs) (Abstract)
Jump to: navigation, search


Rosalie-eva phd 43-lres.jpg


Noun to Verb: an investigation into the micro-politics of publishing through artistic practice

This MediaWiki constitutes a Doctoral thesis which in combination with a portfolio of artistic works is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Artistic Practice at HDK-Valand – Academy of Art and Design, Faculty of Fine, Applied and Performing Arts, University of Gothenburg – supervised by Prof. Jyoti Mistry and Prof. Mick Wilson (2018–20), and Prof. Dave Beech and Prof. Andrea Phillips (2015–18).

The open-source MediaWiki is a tool to develop, map, share, and communicate the writing of my PhD thesis. It is a platform for producing and disseminating the research. The wiki records and maps a looped, iterative, and knowledge-creating process of structuring, writing, thinking, discovering, discarding, and restructuring.

Finding practical ways to share and communicate my research has been an ongoing and, at times, difficult negotiation process between at least five forces seemingly pulling in different directions: academia, institutional policies, feminist and activist practice, the arts, and education.

The Wiki is a practical strategy to bring to life the standoff between those forces and thus make transparent the processes that are usually developed and discussed behind closed doors when a PhD thesis develops: the learning process, the struggle while articulating, the shaping of arguments, the various agreements and disagreements within my head and in dialogue with others. The customized code of this open-source MediaWiki, developed by Manetta Berends and Cristina Cochior (Varia, Rotterdam) includes a comment column for my collaborators in the collective projects to add their voices and perspectives. Here the wiki turns a PhD submission itself into a site of ruptures, dialogue, and potential disagreements.


Spikbladet

LO GUeng cen2.jpg

Doctoral thesis which in combination with a portfolio of artistic works is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Artistic Practice at HDK-Valand – Academy of Art and Design, Faculty of Fine, Applied and Performing Arts, University of Gothenburg – supervised by Prof. Jyoti Mistry and Prof. Mick Wilson (2018–20), and Prof. Dave Beech and Prof. Andrea Phillips (2015–18).



Title: Noun to Verb: an investigation of the micro-politics of publishing through artistic practice

Author: Eva Weinmayr
Annotations: Andrea Francke, Andreas Engman, Femke Snelting, MC Coble, Rosalie Schweiker
Coding: Manetta Berends & Cristina Cochior (Varia)
English proofreading: David Morris, Pedro Cid Proença
Swedish translation: Astrid Trotzig
This doctoral dissertation is No ?? in the series ArtMonitor Doctoral Dissertations and Licentiate Theses at the Faculty of Fine, Applied and Performing Arts, University of Gothenburg www.konst.gu.se/artmonitor
GUPEA: ??
Lincense: Collective Conditions for re-use (CC4r) [link to Constant]
eva.weinmayr@akademinvaland.gu.se


Abstract

Title: Noun to Verb: an investigation into the micro-politics of publishing through artistic practice
Author: Eva Weinmayr
Annotations: Andrea Francke, Andreas Engman, Femke Snelting, MC Coble
Visual Annotations: Rosalie Schweiker
Coding: Manetta Berends & Cristina Cochior (Varia)
English proofreading: David Morris, Pedro Cid Proença
Swedish translation: Astrid Trotzig
Gupea: http://hdl.handle.net/2077/66644
Lincense: Collective Conditions for re-use (CC4r) [link to Constant]


ArtMonitor doctoral dissertations and licentiate thesis no. 81.
ArtMonitor is a publication series from the Faculty of Fine, Applied and Performing Arts, University of Gothenburg. www.konst.gu.se/artmonitor
[artmonitor logo]



This practice-based inquiry explores the social and political agency of publishing by investigating the micro-politics of making and sharing knowledges from an intersectional feminist perspective. Whether "bound" or "unbound," there has been much discussion of the political agency of the book as a medium, yet it is often assumed that the book's political potential extends primarily, indeed if not exclusively, in terms of its content. The focus of this inquiry, however, is the potentially radical, political and emancipatory ways and processes by which a publication is made (authored, edited, printed, bound), disseminated (circulated, described, cataloged), and read (used).

The five projects at the core of this contribution have been developed collaboratively with different constellations of actors across the UK and Sweden and are comprised of: AND Publishing (2010–ongoing), The Library of Omissions and Inclusions (2016–18), The Piracy Project (2010–15), Let’s Mobilize: What is Feminist Pedagogy? (2015–16), and Boxing and Unboxing (2018). These five projects explore intersectional feminist publishing strategies and ask: What if we understood publication not as a finite object? What if we gave attention and value to the processes and practices that lead up to a publication? How can collective processes of publishing themselves be a tactic to practically intervene, disrupt and change existing knowledge practices?

Located at the intersection of contemporary art, radical education, and institutional analysis, this inquiry critically investigates the presumption that publishing is an outright positive and progressive act, a tool of giving voice and developing emancipatory agency. It identifies the paradoxes, conflicts, and contradictions for collective knowledge practices caused by systems of validation and audit culture, by the stasis of the "finite" object and by the authority these discrete objects produce. The research stretches beyond these points by exploring the coercive mutual reciprocity between authorship, authorization, and authority.

At its core, this inquiry aims to expand and test the normative criteria of what constitutes a publication. One of the emergent questions posed was whether publishing may be seen as a verb (a process) rather than a noun (i.e. the finished object). Could practice itself be understood as a form of publishing? A teaching situation, for example – a workshop, seminar, or group dialogue, where knowledge is collectively created and shared at the same time – could this also be considered as publishing? What kinds of publics are necessary or relevant to a publication process? A collaboration, a collective, a scene, a process, a dynamic, a method – can we frame any such situation or process as "publishing"? How fixed or stable does a transmission of knowledges need to be in order to be called a "publication"? And what is the function and effect of such stability?

Since the communication of the research findings (in the form of a PhD thesis) itself constitutes a form of publication, I experimented with an open and dialogical mode of publishing in the form of a MediaWiki – developed “in public” from its very beginning. As such, it turns the thesis from constituting an authoritative text into a site for multiple voices with occasions of negotiation, disagreement, and consultation.