Annotation:6 Analysis/I0bqkd6774
Annotation of | 6_Analysis |
---|---|
Annotation Comment | |
Last Modification Date | 2020-09-07T17:54:30.782Z |
Last Modification User | User:Eva |
Annotation Metadata | ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":1,"name":"Eva"°,"id":"I0bqkd6774","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ31Ӻ","startOffset":283,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ31Ӻ","endOffset":1199°Ӻ,"quote":"s: Each standard and each category valorizes one point of view and silences another. Despite their claim for neutrality and universality classification schemes are socially produced and embedded structures. “They are products of human labor that carry traces of all the intentional and unintentional racism, sexism, and classism of the workers who create them. it is not possible to do classification objectively. It is the nature of subject analysis to be subjective.”Ӷ7Ӻ \n⟶ see presentation: \"Radical Publishing Practices Demand Radical Librarianship\" As it turned out naming and classifying is of highly political endeavour, since, as a representation of the contents that are cataloged, the catalog forms a contested meaning-making structure in itself. It is is not merely a technical search tool, but a cultural object that needs to be discussed and critiqued. Therefore the catalog and its book records should","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210034672296368464252":^°°,^"jQuery3210034672296368464252":^°°,^"jQuery3210034672296368464252":^°°,^"jQuery3210034672296368464252":^°°,^"jQuery3210034672296368464252":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"TextAnnotation","data_creacio":1599497668340°
|
Facts about "6 Analysis/I0bqkd6774"
AnnotationMetadata | ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":1,"name":"Eva"°,"id":"I0bqkd6774","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ31Ӻ","startOffset":283,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ31Ӻ","endOffset":1199°Ӻ,"quote":"s: Each standard and each category valorizes one point of view and silences another. Despite their claim for neutrality and universality classification schemes are socially produced and embedded structures. “They are products of human labor that carry traces of all the intentional and unintentional racism, sexism, and classism of the workers who create them. it is not possible to do classification objectively. It is the nature of subject analysis to be subjective.”Ӷ7Ӻ \n⟶ see presentation: \"Radical Publishing Practices Demand Radical Librarianship\" As it turned out naming and classifying is of highly political endeavour, since, as a representation of the contents that are cataloged, the catalog forms a contested meaning-making structure in itself. It is is not merely a technical search tool, but a cultural object that needs to be discussed and critiqued. Therefore the catalog and its book records should","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210034672296368464252":^°°,^"jQuery3210034672296368464252":^°°,^"jQuery3210034672296368464252":^°°,^"jQuery3210034672296368464252":^°°,^"jQuery3210034672296368464252":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"TextAnnotation","data_creacio":1599497668340° |
Annotation of | 6 Analysis + |
LastModificationDate | 17:54:30, 7 September 2020 + |
LastModificationUser | User:Eva + |